A grant workspace for labs and PIs
Discover & qualify
Pipeline, deadlines, and fit notes so leadership sees what is real, not what is buried in email.
Prepare & submit
Drafts, attachments, and owners in one workspace so submission readiness is obvious.
Award, report, renew
Terms and reporting stay tied to the same record so closeout and the next cycle start from truth.
What lab teams need most
Keep writing, handoffs, and obligations in one place—without rebuilding context every deadline season.
Proposal memory
Reuse narratives, budgets, and attachments without digging through old folders every deadline season.
Clean contributor handoffs
Keep comments, drafts, and ownership visible so co-authors and admins stay aligned during submissions.
Commitments in one timeline
Track reporting dates and deliverables in the same record as the award and application history.
Better renewal readiness
Carry prior context into renewals and continuations so teams spend less time reconstructing decisions.
Questions researchers ask
Is Grantio for teams that run their own applicant portal?
No. Grantio is for teams pursuing grants from funders, not operating a grantmaker application system.
Can small labs use this without a large ops team?
Yes. Many teams start with opportunity tracking and submissions, then layer in reporting workflows.
What should we set up first?
Begin with active opportunities and deadlines, then connect templates and reporting checkpoints.
Can we coordinate multi-PI and cross-department submissions?
Yes. Shared ownership, comments, and a single record for artifacts helps keep contributors aligned without splitting context across tools.
Does this replace our institutional submission system?
No. Use Grantio for planning and proposal execution, then submit through your institution’s required system when it’s time.
Is this useful after we win an award?
Yes. Reporting dates, deliverables, and evidence can stay tied to the award so renewals and progress reports start from real history.